100,000 voices will be required to get motions debated in parliament. A lot of people do not like this, one of my favourite bloggers Mr. North at EU Referendum does not like it either. Yet one of my favourite politicians Mr. Hannan likes it so it would appear we are having a good old bout of difference of opinion. I like it not because I am naive enough to think that it will actually improve democracy in this country but because it is a very useful tool for politicians to shot themselves in the foot with. And since our ruling class is monumentally stupid as it is, you can be quite sure that given the opportunity to shot themselves in their feet; they will.
Politicians nowadays despise the electorate, our current ruling class is a testament to this fact. No one voted for the coalition yet the coalition now votes for us. That is not democracy and certainly not representative democracy where they are supposed to represent us, instead they represent themselves since under the aegis of 'coalition' they threw out their election manifestos, wrote a new one and forced it onto the people under the guise of 'compromise'. We were stupid enough, as always, to swallow that, line, hook and sinker.
Thankfully the public will always outshine private politicians. We have the benefit of 60 million minds and they only have 646 of our kind, not even our best kind, a rather mediocre staple they come from. With few scholars, officers and entrepreneurs. They are by and large sheep and followers, not leaders. Hence it is not a surprise at all that they now think this gimmick of a measure is going to help shore up their popularity (read 'the LibDems popularity').
What will happen is this: we will suggest loads of things we want debated and changed by our "sovereign" parliament. We will submit the HRA for expulsion from the legislature, we will demand that immigration is significantly reduced, we will demand a referendum on the EU, we will enforce very convincingly our commitment to the Armed Forces, we will demand the termination of the Human Rights Commission and we will most likely demand that a number of services such rail traffic and postal services are returned to the public sector. And many others.
They will of course ignore every single one of our requests, when we come, cap in hand, and beg that our masters listen to us.
But what they do not seem to have factored into this ploy is that there will be a lot of these 'citizen's initiatives' - because we, as a whole, despise our politicians and what they have done to this country. When the hoi polloi start to realise that their vox populi is being ignored en masse, even they will realise that their politicians are not serving their best interests.
Hence it will follow; motion after motion will be rejected because it is truly what the people want, people's disillusionment with the ruling class will only grow and grow, the ruling class will become more and more aware of their disillusionment until they one day feel compelled to act on one of the requests.
Alas, this act is a pointless play to the galleries for is should not be needed, politicians should by definition hold the executive to account. They should by definition have balls and a firm spine. But what this act will do is to force the public balls and spine onto our politicians, and there is not a single thing they can do about it.
Unfortunately we are a nation which is going nowhere.
1 comment:
Good piece and spot on.
Democracy? What is that?
Good Government? Have we ever had one?
My own humble view is that the larger the group of people that a Government tries to manage, the less well it does it. This is why the EUSSR is such a almighty clusterfuck of a disaster for the ordinary people. Socialists love it though as they can revel in the mediocrity and bureaucracy of Big Govt.
Adopting a system of self-governing, self-taxing, and self-regulating counties much as the USA used to have before Big Fed took over seems to be the most plausible and efficient way to run the show. Central Govt should only have a mandate for defence, international diplomacy, and regulation of national concerns such as transport.
I've thought long and hard about this subject and I could go on for pages with my ideas but essentially I feel that Little Brother is the answer to many of our ills.
A new UK Bill of Rights outlining what we can do rather than endless libraries of statutes telling us what we are not allowed to do would also be a big step forward in improving everyone's lot. Just don't let any politicos get near it while its being draughted!
Post a Comment